Hey Bassassin201,
This is the first time that I ever heard of this being done. So I had to look it up on-line. Read below on check out the attached link about "Copper Sulfate"
Copper sulfate - negative effects on lakes and ponds
Many individuals, question why Aquatic Biologists, Inc recommends never using Copper Sulfate for algae or aquatic plant management. This decision was actually made based on various research studies that took place prior to the start of ABI in 1977 and has been ongoing ever since. In a nutshell, these studies have found aquatic ecosystems suffer adverse environmental effects when Copper Sulfate is used.
These same research studies found chelated (chemically locked in) copper algaecides (Cutrine Plus, Cutrine Ultra, and Algymicin) are vastly superior to copper sulfate by providing longer contact (killing) time, increased stability in alkaline waters, longer lasting control, and lower dosage rates, while being more environmentally friendly.
Over time the use of copper sulfate can actually increase the frequency and severity of algae blooms. Copper sulfate quickly falls through the water column, allowing algae to be killed only on the day it is applied. Ultimately, Copper Sulfate accumulates within the sediment layer as a heavy metal precipitate. Once a build up of Copper Sulfate begins a sterile lake bottom is likely to develop as invertebrates are killed off. This includes insects and their larvae, crayfish, beneficial bacteria populations which inadvertently weakens the food chain. Over time we may notice a decline in our forage fish (fathead minnows for example), poor body condition in our game fish and an overall reduction in growth rates.
Points to Consider:
•Copper Sulfate has a short term effectiveness is often misused and overused.
•Copper Sulfate remains in the pond and does not bio-degrade.
•Copper sulfate can be toxic to fish and other organisms.
•Copper sulfate results in copper build up in pond sediments and creates a sterile bottom in the pond. Besides many important organisms, it kills beneficial bacteria.
•Chelated copper algaecides contain less elemental copper (7-9%) than copper sulfate (25%), yet are more effective.
•Chelated copper algaecides are effective for longer than copper sulfate because they stay suspended in the water column longer.
•Chelated copper algaecides are less toxic to fish and zooplankton than copper sulfate because they release the copper ion more gradually.
•Copper sulfate is more likely to contribute to rebound blooms of problematic algae than chelated copper algaecides.
•Copper sulfate, a solid, is more hazardous to product applicators due to inhalation exposure to dust particles.
•Copper sulfate bags are notorious for breaking when in storage or transport, creating hazardous material disposal problems.
•Chelated copper algaecides work better in alkaline or colder waters than copper sulfate.
•If a heavy build up of copper sulfate exists where dredging is to occur the dredged materials may be considered hazardous waste making disposal harder and more expensive.
We see this decision as being a considerable benefit to the lake and pond ecosystems we manage, as well as to our personnel who apply algaecides. We sincerely hope that other users of copper sulfate follow our lead and choose safer and more effective algaecides over copper sulfate.
http://www.aquaticbiologists.com/copper%20sulfate.shtml